Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Supreme Partisans’

As the Supreme Court considers Obama-Care, as studies show opponents to Obama-care outspent supporters in attack ads by three to one, and as Mitt Romney tries to Etch-a-Sketch away his Mass-Care past, our political comentator Ol’ Bill weighs in…

OBAMA CARE ON TRIAL: Questions for the Partisan Supremes On the Court and In the Congress by Ol’ Bill

 Why does the rest of the developed world manage to insure the health of all citizens at less than half the per capita costs of America? And why do the statistics also overwhelmingly reflect better health-care outcomes and longer life spans elsewhere? 
Why haven’t these questions been analyzed in serious congressional hearings before allowing the reform debate to be stalemated by the usual ideologues and selfish interests? Wouldn’t a factual comparison with other nations be an appropriate bipartisan demand by hard-nosed spending critics even at this late date?
Shouldn’t taxpayers demand reasons why healthcare costs in recent years have topped 16% of Gross Domestic Product in US vs. only 8.4% in UK, 8.2% in Japan? Why do Canada, France, Japan and Sweden among other advanced countries achieve life expectancies exceeding 80 years vs only 77.8 in US? High cost private insurance in US covers less than half of the actual costs vs. 70 to 87% in the others. Why?
Why was the infant mortality rate recently a mere 3.8% in Germany, 5.4% next door in Canada but 6.9% in U.S.? How inefficient must American private insurance companies become before attracting critical public attention in the Congress or in the Media? How can one American private insurance company freely raise rates in excess of 35% in recent times?
Apparently in other advanced countries, government-run single payer insurance as well as heavily regulated private plans and non-profits deliver consistently better results. (more…)

Read Full Post »